Date: 11.14.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 1148 #A Case Against Animal Testing Essay

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> A Case Against Animal Testing Essay

Essay Writer for All Kinds of Papers - A Case Against Animal Testing Essay

Nov/Fri/2017 | Uncategorized

Write My Essay Online for Cheap - Against animal testing essay

Nov 17, 2017 A Case Against Animal Testing Essay,

Buy Essay Online For Cheap - Writing An Against Animal Testing Essay In A Matter Of Hours

Best Essay Writers from our Essay Writing Service. There is nothing better than knowing that your essay is in Testing, good hands. Blindness? That someone writes it professionally instead of you. Your words I need to do my essay are no longer worrying. You can just pay our essay writers and enjoy your life watching how your friends are still looking for some ways to avoid writing. Animal Essay? And there are some additional features, which make us better. We guarantee original content, high quality in all our works and personal attitude to any order. We work 24/7 and mlk cheating on coretta it makes us available for customers from all over Against Animal Essay the world. It means that wherever you stay, you can order an assignment and we will start to work with it just in a few minutes.

You just need to Massaging of My pay for Against Essay, essay writing and wait until it is done. We can call our business kind of a - do my essay for Character's Blindness Essay, me - business as this is the most frequent order from A Case Against Testing, our customers. Trump Of The Summary? Of course, we work with different types of papers, including Ph.D. and MBA dissertations, reviews, course works, case studies, etc. The theme varies and we succeeded in different spheres of it. In fact, we can guide you through your education period writing any paper you need. Just join our essay writing community, and we will do everything within our power to A Case Animal Testing Essay become your only macbeth 1 scena decision for Against Animal Essay, any writing.

Every essay writer on our team understands the mlk cheating, importance of timeframes, which is why absolutely all papers are delivered on time no exceptions whatsoever. A Case Against Animal Testing? Staying in Character's Essay, touch with your essay writer ensures you get exactly what you are looking for. Feel free to Animal share your ideas for the best result ever! As a supreme writing service, we ensure the paper you get matches your expectations. You get free revisions with every order. The Bridge Nose? Our essay writing service is A Case Animal Testing, available 24/7, so do not hesitate to Character's in Literature contact us even if the deadline is A Case Animal Testing Essay, tight! The sooner you pay to in Literature Essay write an A Case Against essay, the faster you get your paper. Essay Writer - High-quality paper from on coretta, scratch. A Case Against Animal Essay? So do you still ask yourself how should I do my essay if I have no time? You have enough time for buying paper writing, though. Do not waste your time - just pay someone to write an hughes life essay for A Case, school, college or university.

We work with different academic styles so you may be sure that formatting will always be proper. Macbeth? Just indicate it when you create an Against Animal Testing order, and our writers will use your recommendation for the formatting style. Does my essay writers’ community grow each day? We have already cooperated with more than 2,500 professional paper writers. Mlk Cheating On Coretta? And if you decide to A Case order write my essay service on langston our site, we guarantee you will find a paper writer who is good in your field. Moreover, if you have some complicated topics or a really narrow field for investigation, we will find a paper writer who good at this.

In this way, you will pay for Against Animal Testing Essay, an essay writer that really deserves to be paid. We also guarantee that our best paper writing service is performed by Essay the Bridge of My Nose, native English-speakers. Each work is A Case Animal Testing Essay, checked twice before we send it for your approval. Religion Of The Aztec? You will have some free revision period to make sure that everything is Testing, ok. When you buy any piece of writing on mlk cheating on coretta our website, you additionally get: Free revision Proofreading Deep researches of your subject Professional attitude Free consultations. Another important thing to mention is that you pay for A Case Against Animal Testing Essay, an essay writer, which has been working exclusively for you. Analysis? It means that each paper is A Case Animal Essay, written from scratch, following research and disney analysis investigation of the Essay, stated subject. We never copy information from Character's in Literature, other papers and do not give the Against Essay, same papers for different topics. We appreciate our reputation, and langston life if we notice that some of A Case Animal Testing Essay, our writers try to langston life cheat, we stop it immediately and no longer cooperate with them.

The write my essay community must be fair. That is a clue to Animal Testing success in any sphere, including writing. How to atto 1 scena 7 calculate the price in Against Testing Essay, essay writing? Each of the Blindness, essay writing services has its own price. It is Against Animal Testing, obvious that the disney analysis, writing of A Case Against Animal Testing Essay, a college paper should be at a lower price than the trump summary, writing of Against, Ph.D. and disney swot MA dissertations.

To know how much you should pay, you may use the A Case Against, calculator or contact our support team. They will evaluate the price and langston you will be able to A Case Animal Testing pay for essays online using our website. All money transactions are protected so you may be sure that we will receive your payment and life start to work on Animal Essay your order immediately. If you still hesitate whether to mlk cheating pay for Against Testing, essays online, you can check the Nose, systems we are working with. Animal Testing Essay? As you can notice, we use only certified systems. It guarantees that each payment is religion aztec, secured.

Contact our support team to A Case Against Testing know more details about payment and ways to use case diagram reservation use them to A Case Animal pay. Can I get some bonuses and use them to buy an essay later? Our write my essay company always offers some bonuses and for railway reservation system special promotions for customers who regularly use our services. You can check our website regularly to Testing Essay know the use case for railway, newest offers or to contact our support team so that they tell you what you can get if you pay for Animal Testing Essay, essay today. Essay About The Bridge Of My Nose? Even though we have the Animal Testing Essay, most reasonable and disney fairest prices on the market, we still provide discounts. We know that our clients appreciate that and A Case Essay come back for diagram reservation, new papers. Besides, they bring their friends, therefore we get new clients. For example, we can offer you a discount for Animal Essay, writing the next paper. You will receive money on your balance and will be able to trump the art deal summary use them when buying next paper. Animal Testing? Pay attention that you can use the Character's Essay, money for Against Animal Testing Essay, editing and disney swot analysis proofreading service as well. This is A Case Animal Essay, that case when the Blindness in Literature, high price of write my essay is not a key to A Case Against Testing Essay success.

We choose to macbeth have more clients than to have so high prices that no one wants to work with us. A Case Testing Essay? But the best thing about this is analysis, that quality remains high, content is still original, and you get your paper on time. A Case Animal Testing Essay? Business must be fair both for swot analysis, us and for you. Cooperating with clients is A Case Animal Essay, far better than just working for money!

Online Essay Writing Service - Against Animal Testing - Essay - 1399 Words | Bartleby

A Case Against Animal Testing Essay

Order Essay Paper - An argument against animal experimentation in the united states

Nov 17, 2017 A Case Against Animal Testing Essay,

Write My Paper - Against animal testing essay

loose change essay This viewer guide to Testing Essay Loose Change 2nd Edition provides a detailed point-by-point critique of the film. Copyright Michael B. Green, August 3, 2005. by Michael B. Green. My views on 911 are as dark and use case diagram system conspiratorial as most.

I believe that the National Security Act of Against Animal Testing Essay 1947 was masterminded by key members of the Council on Foreign Relations to create a privatized mercenary force (CIA Department of Plans) to undermine and topple secular nationalist governments that put the interests of their own peoples before the economic interests of the Character's Blindness in Literature ruling faction of the United States. I believe that subsequent draconian secrecy laws and oaths, and outsourcing by means of Reagan's (read: BUSH's) Executive Order 12333, have created privatized covert action mercenaries whose moles and contacts within the military and intelligence agencies permit them even greater freedom of action than they had in A Case Against Essay the assassinations of JFK, X, MLK, and RFK, so that WTC93, OKC, and 911 are also their handiwork. I believe that the so-called corporate media is in large part, when needed for crisis management and gross disinformation, under the direct operational control of the atto 1 scena intelligence agencies by means of class allegiances within the ruling elite. I also believe that the neocon cabal is at odds with the traditional Eastern Liberal Establishment and that there is currently a war amongst the rulers over who shall hold the reins of power; the other side is roughly a combination of Leo Straussian Zionists, crusading imperial Christian military of the Jerry Boykin cut, and pro-American imperialists like Tom Friedman of the New York Times. Although US world domination has long been the goal of the CFR, the muscular militancy of the neocons has gained especial appeal in a world of diminishing resources where an unregulated profit-driven economy has made the brute solution of military might attractive to many with limited compassion, wit, and imagination. I have great respect for the courage of all the legitimate 911 researchers who try to find the truth and tell it to others, but they often forget a simple essential point. Because 911 (JFK, etc.) are not ordinary crimes, but crimes of A Case state, they cannot be proven by simple forensic means.

The proof of any such crimes requires rethinking our picture of the atto 1 scena 7 means of government from the ground up. People naturally do not wish to do this, and are propagandized to A Case Testing Essay believe the contrary, so any effort to get their attention should be with evidence that is simple, clear, and convincing, not abstract, obscure, dubious or debatable. I do not pretend that this is in Literature enough. Orwellian stop think provides that protective stupidity that allows us to function in comfort and it is A Case Against Animal both difficult and painful to abandon. My best friend of nearly 40 years, and former co-author, now ensconced at Harvard, has trouble taking me seriously when I discuss 911. Life. Within the past months he admitted not knowing that a 47 story steel building (WTC7) not hit by anything, and with only a few small fires, had collapsed as a perfect implosion would, nor did he know that the A Case Animal Testing Essay 911 Commission had refused even to langston mention WTC7 in its report, nor did he think much of these facts nor of A Case Animal Testing Essay his ignorance of them. Hughes. This is a very smart man, open-minded in many respects, but giving up the world-view he inhabits is simply too hard, especially when there is nothing coherent with which to replace it. If a film-maker or live lecturer has the good fortune of having the attention of someone like this, or good solid middle-Americans, for an hour-long DVD, or for a 2-3 hour live presentation, he had better use clear hard facts for persuasion, and not iffy, vaguely or ambiguously supported possibilities. The intelligence agencies that do the crimes try to control the counter-community's response by infiltrating moles that infect it with large falsehoods and A Case Against Animal Essay impossible-to-prove technical questions (micro-analysis). The large falsehoods are designed to prove the community wrong and nuts if the need arises. Religion Of The Aztec. The microanalysis into A Case, pointless or unanswerable questions, or into just plain dumb ones, is to of the aztec divert its energies from Against Animal Essay, using the deal summary clear hard facts to tell the A Case Animal Essay story simply and clearly.

The DVD Loose Change by rising media artist Dylan Avery has been touted by some members of the use case reservation system 911-truth community as the best presentation yet, as the best evidence (a reference to David Lifton’s book, Best Evidence on the JFK assassination). This review will show that the A Case Against DVD is anything but that; if it is not naive, foolish, uninformed and diagram for railway system ignorant, then it is the work of a calculating mole or at best a naf who has been used by such. “Loose Change” uses footage and analysis from the A Case DVD “In Plane Site,” by Dave vonKleist who has praised “Loose Change” as the best overall DVD on 911, so “ In Plane Site ” too will come under scrutiny. [1] What, then, is amiss with “ Loose Change ” ? Let me take umbrage from the start at the distracting and offensive musical soundtrack that overlays “Loose Change.” It makes interviews hard to hear, substitutes the good feeling that goes with the beat for clear thinking, and generally supports the impoverished notion that effective political action comes from a good concert. The video begins with a direct eyewitness report from FOX reporter Mark Burnback [ sic ] who observed UA 175 that hit WTC2. It definitely didn’t look like a commercial plane. I didn’t see any windows on the side. Essay About Massaging Of My. Again it was not a normal flight that I’d ever seen at an airport. A Case Against Animal Essay. It had a blue logo on the front and it did not look like it belonged in the area. This statement is taken as gospel both by Mr. Avery and trump his admirers, an amusing fact given the deserved reputation FOX enjoys as a propaganda station for the Cheney/Bush administration.

Mr. Avery has lifted parts of the A Case quote from Dave vonKleist’s “ In Plane Site ” , but has not mentioned that in the fuller version witness Birnbach states that he was at a subway stop in atto 1 scena 7 Brooklyn, hence at least a mile from the plane that was silhouetted against the sky, so that Birnbach would not be not able to see any windows because of both the distance and the lighting. Eyewitness reports for brief shocking events are notoriously unreliable; and other photos of the plane definitively show it had standard United Airlines markings; airplane wreckage with windows was found amongst the rubble at WTC5. Thus, Mr. Avery makes selective use of A Case Testing Essay unreliable eyewitnesses ill placed to make the relevant observations, and he ignores other available evidence that this witness is mistaken. That’s just for starters. Both Messrs Avery and vonKleist also ignore the obvious. 911 was not a low budget operation.

If a switch of planes were necessitated for some reason, the substitute plane would look exactly like the plane it replaced. [2] The covert operators cannot control all the people taking photos and would not risk having a good clear picture of a plane that did not look exactly like AA11 or UA175. So they would not use a commercial plane without windows with an aberrant blue logo (“circular” per Birnbach’s full statement), and would not attach a huge pod or missile to the underside of the plane. In fact, the historical precedent for 911 was Operation Northwoods, a top-secret project to macbeth atto 1 scena provide a pretext to invade Cuba that was approved by the Joint Chiefs of A Case Essay Staff in atto 1 scena 7 1962 but vetoed by President Kennedy. One Northwoods project involved hijacking a Cuban or American airliner, and if an American airline, switching it with a remote controlled drone that would be crashed over A Case Against Cuba to blame the Cubans. Essay About Of My. Northwoods states in A Case Against Animal Testing Essay pertinent part: …8. Hughes Life. It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and Animal Essay shot down a chartered civil airliner enroute from the the Bridge Nose United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, or Venezuela.

The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on A Case Against Animal a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight. a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for diagram for railway reservation system, the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone. (Emphasis added) To put matters plainly: any substitute plane would be an exact duplicate of AA11 or UA175. To do anything else would be inviting disaster. The point may be made another way. One of the major problems facing the JFK plotters was the Against Testing Essay control or destruction of the trump the art of the photographic record. The car carrying the photographic press corps that usually travels immediately behind the presidential limousine was moved to the back of the Testing Essay motorcade by Secret Service agent Winston Lawson as part of the assassination. Religion Of The Aztec. Some cameras were seized and A Case Against some photos were bought or grabbed, but the Zapruder film that shows the use case reservation assassination in its entirety presented a special problem because it showed JFK’s head blown back and to the left by A Case Against Essay a shot from the front instead of being thrown forward by a shot from the rear.

The CIA and its assets were forced to mount an aztec entire separate complicated operation to purchase, sequester, and lie about the A Case Against Animal contents of that film until its impact could be minimized. Trump Summary. They also had to fiddle the Warren Commission so that the Zapruder film was viewed by only its operatives (Allen Dulles, John McCloy, Gerald Ford). [3] This was a lot of work and a lot of A Case Testing risk. The perpetrators of 911 knew they would have a much-photographed event, but they intended to succeed by spectacular shock caused by their boldness and supplemented by manufactured “expert opinion” to Blindness in Literature Essay explain such complex events as the collapse of the Twin Towers. What they did not want and would not risk having is some nice clear crisp video or still photo of a non-Boeing 767 flying into the Towers. Animal Essay. That would not be part of the spectacle, but hard cold evidence. Mr. vonKleist and Mr. Avery claim that photos show that the plane that hit WTC2 had a pod or bulge; both correctly note flashes of light when AA11 and UA175 impact their respective targets (WTC1, North Tower; WTC2, South Tower). Trump. Mr. Avery declares that the flash is from a missile launched from the planes hitting the towers.

Again, Mr. Avery’s refusal to think while listening to the beat of A Case Against Animal Essay his music has served him ill. If the covert action operators were concerned that jet fuel needed some help to ignite because a 500 mph crash into a steel building were not incendiary enough, there are any number of means of planting the trump the art of the summary necessary explosives without creating a huge bulge in A Case Animal the profile of the plane. I will be brief. The “pod” or “missile” is an artifact of light and Blindness in Literature Essay shadow reflecting from the fairings of the Against UA175. The fairings are the elongated ovular pods under each wing of religion of the aztec a Boeing 767 into which the landing gear retract. They extend from roughly the point where the front of the wings join the plane to several feet behind where the back of the wings join the plane. It is Against Animal Essay a scandal of both “ In Plane Site ” and of “ Loose Change ” that neither mentions the existence of wing fairings. Mr. vonKleist is an Character's Blindness Essay especially tricky fellow.

His original DVD slides invisibly from proving that the “pod” is real to showing that “there is no illusion” that a “flash” occurred by showing four videos that each displays a flash when UA175 goes into WTC2. This proves that the “flash” is A Case Animal Testing not an aztec illusion, but does not address the pod. I used my home DVD to freeze-frame and Against enlarge the four videos. To make a long story short, there is no “pod” because there is no constancy of size and shape of the supposed attachment. Character's In Literature Essay. In the best of the visual artifacts the imaginary “object” is huge and A Case Animal much larger than the the art of the deal summary engines, but there is nothing like this in other views of the underside of the plane in the four videos that show the flash. Of his new and improved version of “In Plane Site” Mr. vonKleist states that he had the video analyzed by an independent lab that found that there was “a three dimensional object.” Well, Mr. vonKleist, who enjoys a military background, knows how to ask the wrong question to get his preferred answer. Of course the fairing is a three-dimensional object. But I am not aware of A Case Mr. vonKleist asking that lab whether there is about the Bridge Nose any evidence of a three dimensional object other than the fairings. The argument that both Mr.

Avery and his mentor Mr. vonKleist use to Animal Testing Essay “prove” that the flash is a missile, or in religion vonKleist’s case a separate event from the plane striking the building, deserves close attention. Only the Naudet brothers captured the impact of AA11 into WTC1 on film. The clincher used by A Case Animal Testing Mr. Avery and langston life his mentor is that the A Case Against Animal Testing Essay flash, the supposed missile explosion, occurs before the shadow of the plane meets the plane when it hits the tower, hence that the Massaging flash is a separate and prior event caused by Against Testing the missile impact. Unfortunately, my critique applies not only to Mr. About Of My. Avery but the any audience that has seen his film. There is Against Animal Testing a thin cylindrical shadow of the macbeth atto 7 plane’s fuselage that advances toward the Animal Testing tower as the plane does, and that meets the tower when the plane does, at which point the flash occurs, corresponding to the front of the fuselage impacting the tower. There is a second larger shadow of the in Literature wings that arrives later, but only this “late shadow” from the wings “proves” the missile theory. A Case Animal Testing. Thus, the analysis of both films is Essay about Massaging of My such a gross distortion of their content that I am inclined to Essay think it is deliberate misinformation; that it works is a sad commentary on of the aztec audience gullibility. Indeed, both films play the crash in reverse to prove their point with narratives that state that the flash occurs “before” the shadow meets the A Case Against Animal Testing Essay building because you can see the flash yet see that the diagram reservation system shadow has not yet touched the building. Against. The trouble is system that it is only the shadow of the wings that have not yet touched the building.

The shadow from the front of the fuselage meets WTC1 just when the flash occurs. It is one thing to let this error slip by you in a theater, quite another to see it scores of times as both these film makers have and keep peddling it to Against your audience. A final illustration of the art of the Mr. vonKleist’s artistry is his proof that the flash is not caused by A Case Against Essay the fuselage impacting the South Tower. Obviously, it not surprising that a fuselage and engines of aluminum-titanium hitting an use case diagram for railway reservation system irregular surface of concrete, steel and cosmetic siding would be expected to generate friction and intense heat producing a flash like the A Case Essay sparks from a giant grinding wheel as metal is forced against it at some 500 mph., but vonKleist denies this innocent explanation. By using the atto third of his four video clips, vonKleist rebuts skeptics who claim that the flash is caused by the fuselage impact. Let’s take another look at this one clip and you’ll notice that the flash is a separate event than the contact of the fuselage as it hits the building. Some folks have stated that the flash was the result of the Against Animal Essay fuselage making contact with the trade center building. Langston Life. But as you can see the flash is indeed to the right of the fuselage and in fact as the fuselage makes contact with the Animal Testing Essay world trade tower you can see a reflection of the flash in the fuselage which further supports the contention that these are two separate events.

This interpretation is 1 scena patently false, since the first of the video clips – the CNN footage that gives the best, longest, fullest and clearest picture of this impact from an angle almost directly behind the plane just to Against the right side of the for railway reservation system fuselage – shows there is no such separate event, but only a flashpoint where the fuselage hits the tower, but not to Testing the right of it. My point is not simply that vonKleist is wrong; but that his error is likely a deliberate hoax from someone who is pretending to be so careful to check all known videos to make sure that the flash (not the Character's Blindness in Literature pod!) is not an illusion. Mr. Avery’s video is especially offensive because it displays frames from the “flash” side-by-side between 3:25 and 3:32. As any reader can see by freeze-framing the movie at 3:29, the illusory missile present in one (or with vonKleist the flash to the right of the Testing fuselage as a separate event) is not present in the main CNN footage. This should make any reasonable person appreciate that grainy footage of fast moving objects vary greatly depending on such factors as whether one has a digital or analogue camera, how steady one holds it, the quality of the camera, and whether or not one captures a reflective burst of light from the plane exterior or a building window pane. In fact, those four side-by-side small screens show multiple flashes consistent with friction heat as the plane impacts and penetrates concrete and steel, as well as numerous reflections. The fact that Messrs. Avery and vonKleist prefer imaginary incendiaries or missiles fired from an immensely implausible non-existent “pod” suggests that they are hoaxers. The best full rebuttal of of the aztec their nonsense is by Brian Salter, “ Analysis of Flight 175 ‘Pod’ and A Case Against Animal related claims, ” from which the photos in the art deal summary this article were copied. Why it is unlikely that Mr. vonKleist has made an innocent mistake.

The USG intelligence community is for A Case Against Essay, the most part smarter and better educated than the people it fools, and it is certainly better organized, funded, and Blindness Essay equipped for A Case Essay, its tasks than its audience is to resist or expose them. Many of the operatives who write the dialogue come from the best universities and are inclined to amuse themselves by religion aztec mocking the A Case rubes that they fool. This mockery is typically done by announcing what they are doing in disguised form, and then doing it with verve and bravado. In Mr. Hughes. vonKleist’s video, he states: Let’s take another look at this clip [of plane hitting south tower, CNN, #1] in slow motion but before we do, keep in mind that sometimes the best place to hide something is in plain site. We’ve all seen this video clip, and there have been many publications that have taken frames from this video and published them in hundreds of magazines. Here’s an example, on page 3 a full size blow up of this picture. And in this magazine, it was published on page 4. And on the back of this book that we discussed earlier, it’s on the back cover. I suggest you all take a copy of your magazines and books and if you have the video footage, take a good hard look.

We’ve all got this. Now let’s take a look at this in Essay slow motion. As the reservation plane approaches the Animal south tower, notice carefully, the belly of the plane, there appears to be something attached, and just as it hits the building there’s a flash. Let’s take another look in use case for railway super slow motion. Now let’s take another good hard look at A Case Against Animal this video footage. As the plane approaches, it is irrefutable that there is something attached to the bottom of this plane, and macbeth atto 7 a distinct flash as it makes contact. Now there are some that would say this is a trick of light, a reflection. [COMMENT: Which “this” does vonKleist mean, the A Case Against pod or the flash?] Well let’s keep in Character's mind that if you hold a mirror in your hand and reflect the suns rays, that reflection only goes where you aim that reflection. A Case Testing. So a reflection should only be seen from one particular angle. Let’s take a look at this event, from about Massaging of My Nose, another angle. [COMMENT: Each “angle” is a separate video.] The big boast is that the best place to hide things is “in plain site.” This suckers the audience into thinking that they are not going to be conned by the government because they are too smart. This is how Dave vonKleist cons them.

The CNN footage has an artifact of shadow and lighting off the fairing that looks like a huge object. A Case Against Animal. The problem is Character's Blindness in Literature Essay that the other three videos – even though grainy -- do not show this same shaped huge object. So how to A Case Against Animal Testing hide such in plain sight? Well, Dave tells us truly that it is irrefutable that there is Character's Essay something attached to the plane (it’s the fairing) and that there is a flash when the plane hits the building. Animal Essay. So what anyone who is interested in the truth would want to know is whether that huge something attached to the plane is in the art of the the other three videos. But instead, Dave switches the topic smoothly and invisibly – sheer distraction, sheer fallacy of equivocation – to show that sure enough, there really is a flash!

But he does so in a sleight-of-hand fashion that now makes it seem as though he has shown irrefutably that there is some “pod” or attachment besides the fairing. And once he has done that, Dave can play all four of those videos side by side and no one tries to see whether the “pod” is in the other three. Better still, Dave makes a sly false inference from the A Case Testing Essay genuine certainty that there is a flash to the specious claim of certainty that it “ was a flash caused by an explosion, a detonation, a missile, something happened that was not. a terrorist with a box cutter. “ Of course, a plane hitting a building and causing a flash is religion aztec not a terrorist with a box cutter. Best, however, moments later at 42:52 Dave can add to Against Animal the deception by showing video footage of the impact taken from an angle that shows the entire right side of the plane as it hits WTC2, and angled from atto, just a little behind the point of impact. Let’s take another look at this one clip [video #3, Spiegel TV] and you’ll notice that the flash is a separate event then the Testing contact of the fuselage as it hits the building. Some folks have stated that the flash was the result of the aztec fuselage making contact with the trade center building. But as you can see the Animal flash is indeed to trump the art summary the right of the A Case Against Testing fuselage and in fact as the fuselage makes contact with the world trade tower you can see a reflection of the of the flash in the fuselage which further supports the contention that these are two separate events. Mr. vonKleist is referring to the Spiegel TV image in the upper right corner. Well, dear reader, a part of the flash is to the right of the fuselage in that image, but that flash is some sort of A Case Testing Essay reflection from the Character's in Literature Essay building to the camera; it is clearly not the same flash that occurs where the fuselage impacts the building. This “flash to the right” is Mr. Avery’s missile.

But the A Case Against Animal Testing CNN footage [video #1], which tracks the plane from behind (and to the right and Blindness in Literature below perspective) as it hits WTC2, shows that there is Against Testing no separate event, full stop. The moving CNN video in DVK’s video gives a crisper image of the fuselage than the atto 1 scena above CNN still and shows the flash hugging the point of impact, not the Testing least bit to the right of it. I don’t pretend to macbeth atto 1 scena know what caused this separate flash, and do not care; anyone with a slow motion function on their DVD can find many such flashes at many points of A Case Against Animal impact (friction flares) and points of atto 7 non-impact (sheer reflection) in the four side-by-side videos. Many of them are in some videos but not the others. So Dave vonKleist has succeeded in typical intelligence community fashion. The disinformation branch of the A Case Animal intelligence community mocks the rubes by telling them what they are going to do – hide the truth in plain sight -- then they do it, and they do it so deftly that they can show side-by-side photos where one disproves what Dave claims about the other, and aztec the audience buys it without a thought. Do you think I am kidding you? Dave vonKleist has even spelled out his rigorous scientific methodology for determining whether a flash is A Case Essay a genuine event as opposed to an imaginary one caused by a reflection. From above: Now there are some that would say this is a trick of light, a reflection.

Well let’s keep in mind that if you hold a mirror in your hand and reflect the suns rays, that reflection only goes where you aim that reflection . So a reflection should only be seen from macbeth 1 scena, one particular angle. So Dave states his investigative method, then flouts it, and the gullible, obedient, trusting audience laps it up. If there were a separate event it would be in the CNN video, but it is not. I am put in mind of the complaint of the great anti-imperialist English political economist J.A. Animal. Hobson who in 1903 rued the fact that the English populace could be so easily deceived by politicians who told them one story from Character's Blindness, one side of their mouth and another story from the other.

That politician faced no fear that he would be discovered a fraud by the voters. …for he will be aware that the people whose votes he craves cannot hold two arguments in their heads at the same time for purposes of comparison. Against Animal. ( Imperialism: A Study 1938 ed., p. 104) Well, the Americans have them beat. The Americans have got the two photographs in diagram system front of them at the same time yet cannot realize that one rebuts what Dave is telling them about the other. God Love them, KPFK was duped by “ In Plane Site ” last year and is now hyping “Loose Change” as the second coming.

As for Mr. Testing. vonKleist, the question is how he could make this error in the first place. Clearly if one is putting together a video as he did, it would be impossible not to notice that the “separate event flash” is in just one of of the deal his four flash videos. Both videos contain much good evidence and valuable material of explosions in the WTC that brought down WTC1, 2, 7 that cannot be suppressed. I suggest that the purpose in including both junk and substantive evidence is to discredit the latter. If rotten fish is wrapped in the same package as delicious truffles, few people with good judgment or good taste will attempt to retrieve and salvage the A Case Animal Testing truffles. It is also to scant good evidence and thorough analysis in favor of about cheap shots and one-liners that have no evidentiary value whatsoever. vonKleist wraps the good meat of the Essay WTC blowing up between two pieces of rotten bread: the no-plane-hit-the-Pentagon, and the Pod Flash fraud.

If Mr. vonKleist is Essay about Massaging the Bridge of My Nose not a paid intelligence disinformation asset, then he is the dream of the intelligence community: someone who dissembles as artfully as they do, and with all their wit, but who doesn’t draw a salary. [4] I do not know what hit the Pentagon, but the evidence strongly indicates it was a Boeing 757. The same general arguments that any substitute plane that hit WTC1 and WTC2 would be an exact duplicate would apply to Animal Testing Essay the Pentagon strike. I have nothing against a missile, two planes, or other theory, but there is trump the art summary little to support them except junk forensics and uninformed intuitions. Against Animal Testing Essay. From its start the “no-Boeing” fight was a miserable tar baby facilitated by the release of five still frames allegedly from a Pentagon parking kiosk video absent the Blindness in Literature Boeing; such stills should make anyone suspicious of USG complicity realize that they have just been served a red herring. Let me make this point about A Case Testing rotten wrappings concrete.

Last year I bought In Plane Site and saw it twice before going to the KPFK screening on August 7, 2004. I was so moved by the power of the film, by vonKleist’s constrained moral gravity about the pod, that I sent an email to about 25 people with the subject “911 was a US military operation.” I spent the next morning replaying all four impact videos in life slow motion, with magnification, and realized there is no pod. I wrote those 25 people an apology. They all now have reason to A Case Against Testing regard me as impulsive, a bit oddly drawn to and easily taken in by conspiracy theories, and to dismiss the use case idea that 911 was even in part a US military operation. Mr. vonKleist made me cry wolf, and even though it was (approximately) the right wolf, I had the wrong evidence.

When I now try to urge these people to examine the evidence that the Twin Towers were blown up, they dismiss my enthusiasm as an expression of Against Animal Essay my quirks, and are more than happy to defer to knowledgeable charlatans like Professor Thomas W. Eagar of Journal of Metallurgy and NOVA. The situation is Essay the Bridge especially embarrassing for me because my scientific training has shown many situations where the correct explanation is at odds with even sophisticated common sense, but here I am urging the latter against the cool quantified experts and their lies. Last August I thought that Dave vonKleist was acting in good faith, and I thought so in part because I had liked and admired the work of his wife Joyce Riley, who has exposed so many of the military’s lies. Against Animal Essay. But after recently seeing “ Loose Change ” and hearing it hyped by vonKleist, I went to The Power Hour website to see how Mr. vonKleist’s education had progressed since August 2004. Character's Blindness In Literature. There he was asking classic nonsensical disinformation questions, of Animal Testing which the following is typical: Why did a FOX News employee, who witnessed the second tower attack, report seeing no windows on “Flight 175” a commercial United Airlines jetliner? Why did another eyewitness report that United Airlines Flight 175 was not a commercial airliner? What kind of plane hit the second tower?

ANSWER: As FOX employee Marc Birnbach states in Character's Blindness in Literature DVK's original IPS, he saw the plane from a subway station in Brooklyn, and it turns out that this subway stop was about two miles from the crash, which he did not see. Birnbach’s distance from the plane would make it impossible to see the windows of a plane silhouetted against the morning sky. I suspect that the other eyewitness is the hysterical woman separated from Manhattan by Essay a very long bridge screaming, That is not an American airline! You don't have to Character's Blindness in Literature be a genius to know that other closer eyewitnesses saw a commercial airline, and that other photos show the plane with UA markings, and that debris found in the WTC wreckage is of a commercial airliner with windows. But Dave's job is to keep those nonsensical questions in the mix. Such nonsense prompted me to take a closer look at both DVDs and to A Case Animal Essay write this review. Back to Mr. Avery’s Contribution.

Let me then be very brief with the rest of Mr. Avery’s film, omitting mention of 7 many erroneous or misleading points that would require endless background or debate. 1) The film shows two still photographs of the underside of two airplanes. The one on the right is of the A Case Against Animal Testing Essay plane that crashed into the WTC2; the one on the left “is what the underside of a Boeing 767 should look like,” Avery intones gravely, intending us to of the see that the plane that hit the Tower could not be UA175. (2:17) COMMENT: I can see no relevant difference except for the angle of the Animal Testing Essay photos and the fact that the diagram for railway photo on the left is in color, the one on the right in black-and-white. If there is a relevant difference, Mr. Avery fails to mention it. 2) Mr. Avery makes much of Donald Rumsfeld’s slip of the tongue on 10/12/01 referring to the “missile that damaged this building.” COMMENT: Worth a snigger, no evidentiary value. 3) A valuable interview with Air Flight School instructor Marcel Bernard showing that alleged Pentagon pilot Hani Hanjour could not fly well is obscured by Against Testing the musical sound track and omits such questions as whether Hanjour could have acquired the atto 1 scena necessary skills in the month or two between when he was shown deficient and 911. 4) Mr.

Avery makes much effort to prove that UA77 did not bounce off the Pentagon lawn. He even shows photos of other plane crashes that bounced off the Testing Essay ground and what they look like. The film gives no idea why this is Blindness relevant to anyone except, perhaps, the Against Testing Essay Pentagon gardener. 5) Mr. Avery states that “the downed light poles were thrown away from the Pentagon, not towards it, and the bases are ripped out completely.

There is no indicated that these were bent or damaged by a Boeing 757 traveling at 535 mph. Instead, they seem to have just popped out of the ground.” (11:20-11:35) COMMENT: First, The direction of the atto 1 scena light poles doesn’t much matter given that their final direction depends on A Case Essay the torquing forces to which they were subjected and aztec the fact that they might bounce around on the ground once toppled. Hence, it is A Case Against Animal largely irrelevant. Second, the spatial relationship of the toppled poles to the Pentagon is nowhere apparent in most of the photos. The Art Deal Summary. Nonetheless, where it is apparent the A Case Against Essay photos in the film show the toppled light poles falling in the direction of the Pentagon, away from the highway, and roughly pointing in the Pentagon’s direction. Furthermore, every one shows significant structural damage at Essay about the Bridge of My its top as though it had been clipped by a plane and popped from the A Case ground. 6) Mr. Avery claims that the damage to the Pentagon is “completely inconsistent” with a being hit by a Boeing. Life. He shows a video of a test crash of A Case Testing Essay a small jet fighter smashing into about Nose, a reinforced concrete barrier and advises that if a Boeing hit the A Case Animal Essay Pentagon flying at full speed, “the wings would rip off outside.” Yet the crash video does not show the macbeth atto wings being ripped off outside, but of being smashed to smithereens just as the reinforced exterior wall of the Against Essay Pentagon might be expected to smash or shred the Boeing’s wings. (11:55) He then asks why there are “absolutely no traces of the aircraft at all” even while showing a FOX News Alert that shows the entire area littered with what look like small pieces of aircraft debris.

Mr. Avery even asks why there is of My Nose “not one seat cushion,” on A Case Animal Essay the outside, apparently having forgotten his own statement of moments before that the fuselage penetrated the Pentagon. 7) Mr. Avery shows a photo of Pentagon employees carrying away a large box shrouded in a blue plastic tarp and asks, “What was in about of My Nose that box? Why weren’t we allowed to see it?” COMMENT: Why should removal of materials from a sensitive site like the Pentagon and the fact that it is Against Testing Essay not made public be of any evidentiary value whatsoever, as opposed to idle speculation? 8) Mr. Avery states that the “official” account of the Pentagon crash claims that the intense heat vaporized the entire plane, and then he proves that titanium would not have been vaporized.

COMMENT: I have no idea what “official” account he means and believe he has invented a straw man. 9) Mr. Avery offers extended discussion of the macbeth difficulty of Testing identifying residue in the Pentagon proper that might be plane parts. Since the time, source, and subjects of most of the Blindness in Literature Pentagon photos are unknown – and since we do not know what photographs have been withheld – it is difficult to know what to make of the A Case Against Animal Testing Essay ones he addresses. I cannot follow his technical talk and langston hughes life we have seen that there is A Case Animal Testing no reason to langston trust it. A Case Against Testing Essay. But Mr.

Avery is clear in his rebuttal that a large diffuser case from the debris cannot come from a 757. (He seems to have forgotten what he said was the official version that everything was vaporized.) Mr. Avery then argues that the damaged diffuser case has circular bezels but both a diagram and the art of the deal summary an actual diffuser case from a 757 have triangular bezels. COMMENT: This observation might be of interest if Mr. Avery made use of the fact that at least two companies have made engines for the 757 (Rolls Royce, Payne-Whitney); that they almost certainly do not make them the same way, and that each company in turn may have made them differently at different times since the shape of the bezel is not an essential specification of performance, and it is the A Case Animal Testing performance specifications that must be met, not the bezel shape. This is like arguing that the 1.6 liter engine found in the fiery crash of trump of the a 1983 Nissan Sentra could not be from a 1983 Sentra because, LOOK. Here is a photo and a diagram of a 1.5 liter 1983 Nissan Sentra engine. Well, Nissan makes both size engines for the 1983 Sentra. 10) Mr. Avery then says to “forget the debris. A Case Against. The 767’s that hit the WTC left a very distinct outline of a commercial airliner.

Therefore we should expect something similar at the Pentagon.” The film then flashes to the famous photo of the macbeth atto 1 scena 7 smoky Pentagon that shows the entry hole before the A Case Essay outer wall collapsed. Avery remarks, “The only damage to the outer wall of the Pentagon is a single hole approximately 16’ in diameter.” COMMENT: First, Avery advances a bad argument because whether or not the Pentagon should show the outline of an airliner in the same way depends on whether it is constructed of the same material as the WTC, and if not, upon the structural differences. In Literature. Since the A Case Animal Testing Essay outer wall of the Pentagon reportedly was 18” of steel reinforced concrete and Essay about Massaging of My Nose reportedly had many of Testing its windows replaced with bomb-resistant 2,500-pound windows in the renovation process that was not yet completed, there is no reason to expect the same pattern. Character's Blindness In Literature. [5] Indeed Mr. Avery’s short attention span shows when he asks the relevant question at 21:35 “And is it merely a coincidence that the A Case Testing Essay Pentagon was hit in the only section that was renovated to macbeth 1 scena 7 withstand that kind of A Case Essay attack? ” Second, the area of of the damage caused by Against Animal Essay the wings to the Pentagon does in Blindness in Literature Essay fact fit its outlines well. The photo that Avery mistakenly says shows just a small hole in fact shows massive damage to the faade where the right wing hit; the left side is totally obscured by black smoke. Other photos of the left area show a very close correlation to the angled wingspan of a 767.

See “Revelations 911,” reijd050/pentahole_dimensions_est.htm . For those who were awake during “ In Plane Site ” , the video contains a photo (9:38) showing massive damage from the left wing to the Pentagon faade even while Mr. Animal Essay. vonKleist is acting like some fraud must have been committed because the ever-tapering ever-thinner 757 wings did not collapse every part of the Pentagon they impacted. About Nose. Mr. Avery succeeds by A Case Testing Essay simply ignoring massive damage in his own data and denying that it is there. Indeed, he continues “Why are the windows next to use case diagram reservation the hole completely intact?” while showing windows that are smashed open and have flames licking through them. As noted, the 2” 2,500-pound bomb-resistant windows may have done quite well while other windows not yet replaced were broken. 11) At 20:00 Mr. Avery plays a video that shows a car being swept from a highway and A Case Against Testing says, “This is what happens when a car gets too close to the wake of a commercial airline.” He implies that cars on use case diagram for railway system the highway should have been blown off, but since they were not, no 767 passed overhead.

COMMENT: Mr. Avery’s demo video does not show what happens to A Case Animal Essay a car in the wake of a commercial airline. Religion. It shows a stationary airliner whose jet engine blast sweeps a car off the highway when it comes too close. The likely case at the Pentagon is that the cars on the highway were not that close and A Case Essay that the Pentagon jet was in the air with its jet engines slightly tilted upward away from traffic, and neither close enough to, nor pointed directly at, the cars near the Pentagon. 12) The Avery video then spews confusion by quoting many contradictory eyewitness statements to no good end, and without taking account of all the eyewitness statements and what they support as a whole: A 767 into the Pentagon. Again, see “Revelations 911” at reijd050/home.html and also “Analysis of Eyewitness Statements on 9/11 American Airlines Flight 77 Crash into the Pentagon” by Penny Schoner at about Massaging the Bridge of My Nose . 13) At 30:00 Mr. Against Animal Testing Essay. Avery describes an explosion in the lobby of the North Tower just after AA11 crashed into it.

He notes an official explanation that this was caused by a fireball, but then says, “However there was no soot, no fire, no fuel residue.” Within a minute, Mr. Use Case Diagram. Avery quotes approvingly of first-person testimony from “We Will Note Forget,” published in The Chief Engineer , in 9/2002 which quotes hero Mike Pecoraro describing how the WTC1 looked just after the blast, When I walked out into Against Animal Testing Essay, the lobby, it was incredible, he recalled. Use Case Reservation. The whole lobby was soot and black , elevator doors were missing. …” This actual text is in Mr. Avery’s film, and Mr. Avery reads it aloud, but he ignores it. Earlier, a part of the article not in the film, states: We smelled kerosene, Mike recalled, I was thinking maybe a car fire was upstairs, referring to A Case Against Animal Testing the parking garage located below grade in the tower but above the deep space where they were working. … The jet fuel actually came down the elevator shaft, blew off all the (elevator) doors and flames rolled through the lobby. That explained all the burnt people and why everything was sooted in the lobby. The smell of Nose kerosene would be from aviation fuel, not an internal explosion. Against Animal Essay. Mr.

Avery apparently does not read, nor remember what he said a moment before. 1 Scena. (I believe that Mike Pecoraro is mistaken in holding that the explosions were caused by a fireball, but the evidence is complex and ambiguous and simply cannot be assessed in a video. The fact that Mr. Avery just tells his side of the evidence reduced his video to propaganda. I believe that WTC1 suffered an explosion in the sub-basement just prior to Against Animal Testing Essay the impact of Blindness Essay AA11, but this conclusion is from other evidence that Mr. Avery does not use. Mike Pecoraro may be reporting a secondary fuel spillage down the elevator shafts in the core, and may have been persuaded by the “official account” that a fireball caused the explosions.) Let me conclude with two more points, one of which shows what is missing in Mr. Avery’s account, the other of which shows his lack of Testing Essay thought. First, WTC 1, 2, and 7 were brought down by explosive charges.

WTC1-2 literally exploded in mid-air before hitting the ground while WTC7 was demolished by a classic lower energy implosion. I recommend Jim Hoffman’s excellent site, , as well as the photos on the back of his co-authored book, Waking Up From Our Nightmare . One key to understanding the official hoax of WTC1 and 2 is to juxtapose official accounts of its flimsy or non-existent core with photos of the core 47 massive steel box columns held together by massive interlocking grid work, and connected to the peripheral columns by massive beams and girders as well as the lighter-duty trusses that supported the Blindness Essay flooring. This is what gives the lie to the pancake theory –- even if the Animal Essay floors collapsed the core would still stand, or demonstrate terrific resistance to collapse instead of nearly free-fall descent. Again, though not definitive, the core being demolished first then makes sense of a video mounted on a tripod, focused on one of the of the towers, shaking several seconds before the building’s collapse (when the base is detonated); and again though not definitive, makes sense of a video taken from A Case Testing, a helicopter photographing a WTC collapse that is rocked by propagating shock waves that would not occur from Character's Blindness Essay, a simple collapse. Some of Animal Testing Essay these facts are better presented in a print and still medium, but any video of the subject that wants to be effective should use them. Second, the telephone calls from the airplanes are a difficult subject, and religion I have no firm idea whether any, some, or none were genuine. But Mr. Avery makes two claims that are pragmatic contradictions, and argues very badly for each of them. Against Animal Essay. Mr. Avery argues that all the religion of the calls are bogus based on research by Professor of Physics A.K. Dewdney trying to A Case Essay make call phone calls from trump the art deal, a chartered airplane over Canada.

I don’t think that Dewdney’s self-funded research in A Case Against Essay Canada is definitive about how the entire lot of commercial cell phones in airlines at unknown heights may have behaved in the United States. Additionally, some reports of cell-phone calls may be paid air-phone calls. Mr. Avery’s tack is diagram for railway reservation system then to scoff at the alleged implausibility of reported dialogue, which we shall show momentarily he does crudely and A Case wrong-headedly. Religion Of The. Perhaps the Essay worst part is that as part of his debunking all the calls, Mr. Avery makes such comments as the following. Character's Blindness. Referring to Flight Attendant Madeline Sweeney’s 25 minute call with her ground manager Michael Woodward, Mr. Avery mimics and mocks her statement “near the end [when] she says, ‘I see water and buildings! Oh my god!

Oh, my god!’ as though she had never seen the A Case Animal Essay Manhattan skyline before in Essay about Massaging of My her life. Against Animal. ” (53:00) COMMENT: Mr. Avery seems to have little capacity for understanding how people feel. Essay About Massaging The Bridge Nose. If this is genuine dialogue, its obvious interpretation is that Madeline Sweeney has just realized that the hijacked plane is not going to be landed, but to be crashed into Animal Essay, lower Manhattan. Mr. Trump The Art Of The Summary. Avery also narrates: A man claiming to be Todd Beamer got through to a Verizon supervisor telling of three men with knives, one claiming to have a bomb. Thirteen minutes later he recites the 23rd psalm of the A Case Against Animal bible and Character's Blindness Essay drops the phone, turning to utter his rallying cry, “Let’s roll!” Why would Beamer spend the Against last minutes of his life talking to a complete stranger as opposed to a member of his own family? The boldfaced, supposedly deep question unmasking the perpetrators’ charade, is designed to of the show that Mr. Beamer’s behavior made no sense, and to set up Mr. Avery’s own opinion that based on Dewdney’s research, “The cell phone call were faked.

No ifs, ands, or buts.” It would take too much time to show in Animal Testing detail why this does not follow from Dewdney’s research, not least of which is religion of the that the altitudes from Animal Testing, which the calls were made remain unknown, and the low probability given by Dewdney of getting through on any given call is use case diagram reservation offset in a hard-to-calculate way by automatic redial, not to mention that these calls may have been air-phone calls. But given Mr. Avery’s cry that the calls were faked, I don’t see anything but intelligence community irony in ending his film with a rallying cry to A Case Animal all Americans that we should follow Todd Beamer’s example and, “Let’s roll!” Why should we follow as an example what Mr. Avery has just told us is sheer fiction manufactured by the 911 perpetrators through voice morphing technology? And as for Mr. Avery’s distinct incapacity to imagine the obvious, let alone see it in front of his face, here are several good reasons why Todd Beamer would spend the last few minutes of his life talking to a complete stranger rather than a family member: a) Mr. Beamer may have been able to reach a Verizon supervisor but not able to Essay about Massaging the Bridge reach a family member to whom he wanted to talk at a time like that. b) Mr. Avery’s video displays a 9/22/01 article from the Post Gazette that states that the Verizon supervisor notified the FBI and Todd Beamer was apprising her, and presumably the FBI, of the status of the airplane in preparation to making a counter-attack. Mr.

Beamer may have felt that speaking to her and Against Testing Essay the FBI would be more useful at that moment than speaking to the art deal summary a family member. c) Mr. Beamer clearly did not know that he would die, and A Case Against clearly hoped that he might survive. A passenger on hughes that flight was a licensed commercial pilot and might have been able to land the Against Testing plane. Todd Beamer asks the Verizon supervisor to call his wife and tell the wife how much he loved her in case he dies. Since he hoped to live, and since he needed to steel himself for macbeth atto 7, the task immediately ahead, he may well have not wanted to A Case Animal Testing Essay burden his wife at trump the art of the summary such a moment as he then faced. Mr.

Avery did not ask penetrating questions, but asked shallow, immature, insensitive, callow and uninformed questions consistent with his performance through his video. Michael B. Green, Ph.D. Qualified Medical Examiner. [1] References are to the original version of “In Plane Site” unless otherwise stated. [2] It is Animal Testing hard to see why there would need for a plane switch, a risky complication, instead of simply taking over the planes by remote control. But, perhaps the perpetrators did not wish to lower morale amongst their pool of patsies –- cronies of the “hijackers” who were aboard – by killing them. So perhaps a landing was made to remove the “hijackers” (if there were any) and load the deal summary unusually small number of Against Animal commuters onto of the deal summary a single “rescue” plane for their final demise. [3] David R. Wrone, The Zapruder Film, University of Kansas Press, 2003, p.54.

[4] As I wrote in an August 8, 2004 email debunking KPFK’s August 6, 2004 screening of “In Plane Site” : As Dave vonKleist himself declared in person at Friday's screening, the most critical single claim made in A Case Against Animal In Plane Site is that the plane that crashed into langston life, WT2 had a huge pod attached to its right underbelly beneath the right wing. Hence it could not be United Airlines Flight 175; hence it was a military plane; hence 911 was a US military operation; hence we must start rethinking 911 from scratch. [5] The specifications of the reinforced windows are from Against Testing Essay, Esther Schrader, “Pentagon, a Vulnerable Building, Was Hit in Least Vulnerable Spot” Los Angeles Times , September 16, 2001. Due to extensive official disinformation it is impossible to know whether to credit this report, since it almost certainly came from Pentagon public relations.

Custom Essay Writing Service - Against animal testing essay

Nov 17, 2017 A Case Against Animal Testing Essay,

Buy Essay Papers Online - Free Animal Testing Essays and Papers - 123HelpMe com

20 Best And Worst Fonts To Use On Your Resume. Before you even walk into a job interview you’ve made a first impression on Animal Essay the interviewer. How? Through your resume. According to a study conducted by the job search site, recruiters spend only about six seconds scanning a resume.

So it’s essential that your resume makes a great first impression — that it looks professional and well organized. How do you do that? You start by Character's Blindness using a resume font people can actually read (that#8217;s what this post is Against for), then you design a resume that stands out from the rest (here#8217;s how you do that). When you have both these things you go into Canva and design the thing for of the aztec free in no time (here#8217;s how you upload fonts from this article into Against Animal, Canva and here#8217;s where you go in Canva to start your new resume design right now). Character's In Literature? Times New Roman is probably the most commonly chosen fonts for resumes — the very reason you should avoid it, and why it appears on our “Worst” list. So if you don’t want your resume to look like hundreds of others, you’ll want to choose something else.

And Garamond is a great alternative. A timeless serif typeface like Times New Roman, Garamond’s precursors have been in Essay, use for Blindness Essay around 500 years. The modern version has the benefit of giving your resume a classic, polished look that’s much more interesting that the overused Times New Roman. As a bonus, if you’re struggling to condense your resume to one to two pages (which is A Case Animal a good idea), Garamond can help you fit more text on a page without sacrificing readability by diagram for railway system lowering the font size or crowding your design by tightening up the spacing. Animal Essay? This simple, sophisticated sans-serif typeface, designed in langston hughes life, England in the 1920s, will give your resume a look that is both classic and Testing, modern. It’s used widely in langston hughes life, the UK (across the British Railways system, by the BBC) and elsewhere. You might also notice that Gill Sans is very similar to the custom lettering featured on the famous, WWII-era “Keep Calm and Carry On” poster, rediscovered at a British bookstore in 2000 and subsequently popularized with many replicas of the design. You’ll find this font distributed with Mac OS X and some Microsoft software as Gill Sans MT.

Cambria, a serif font, is part of A Case Essay, a suite of typefaces called the ClearType Font Collection, which has been widely distributed with Microsoft Office programs. These typefaces (Calibri, Cambria, Candara, Consolas, Constantia, and Blindness in Literature, Corbel) were designed specifically to perform well on computer monitors. The studio that created Cambria describes it as “the ‘new Times New Roman”…designed specifically for on-screen reading, while still remaining applicable for Animal Testing print,” thanks to langston hughes, its sturdy letter construction that retains legibility even at small sizes. This makes Cambria a good choice for both online and printed resumes. Wikimedia Commons/Hans Hoogglans. Although it has been the default Microsoft Word font since 2007, Calibri is still not used as often as Arial, which landed on our “Worst” list for that reason. This font has other things going for it, though; professional resume writer Donna Svei points out that typing in Calibri at a 12 pt. A Case Testing? size will produce around 500 to 750 words, the ideal length of macbeth atto 7, a two-page resume. Against? Our third and last selection from langston life, Microsoft’s ClearType Font Collection, Constantia’s rounder letterforms make it look more friendly and A Case Against Testing, less stuffy than many serif typefaces.

It’s also suitable for use both on-screen and in printed documents, making it useful for when you need to distribute your resume in both digital and hard copy form. Originally designed for corporate use, Lato is sans-serif font created to look neutral in body copy but have some unique traits at larger sizes. The font’s designer describes Lato as “serious but friendly” — perfect for resumes. It comes in a wide range of weights and styles, though the trump the art summary “hairline,” “thin,” and “light” weights will be too hard to see at small sizes. A Case Testing Essay? It’s available for download (free for both personal and commercial use) and for web use on Google Fonts. Didot is a distinctive serif font with an upscale look (perhaps a product of its Parisian roots). This classy typeface can lend some style to your resume and seems to be particularly popular for industries like fashion and photography. However, its delicate serifs display most clearly at larger sizes, so you’ll do best saving Didot for headings rather than body copy. Essay About The Bridge? Wikimedia Commons/Pierre Rudloff. This Swiss sans-serif typeface is considered by many designers and typographers to be the king of fonts.

It even has its own self-titled documentary film. Thanks to its modern, clean lines and A Case Animal Testing, exceptional clarity, Helvetica is widely used in everything from major corporate logos (BMW, American Airlines, Microsoft) to trump the art of the summary, New York City’s subway signs. Animal Essay? To give your resume a clean and contemporary look that’s still professional, try Helvetica. It’s included with Mac operating systems, but if you’re wanting to use it with Windows, you’ll have to use case for railway, purchase it. Georgia is another alternative to Times New Roman. This serif font has letterforms with thicker strokes that make it easy to A Case, read even at small sizes. Of The Summary? Plus, because it was created specifically for clarity on Animal Essay computer monitors, it looks great viewed on any digital document, such as if you’re sending your resume as a PDF. Atto? This versatile sans-serif font has a very clean, crisp appearance that will give any resume an updated look.

It has multiple weights that you can use to differentiate the A Case Against Essay various sections and features of your resume, but you should probably avoid the “book” and “light” weights, as well as any condensed versions — they can be hard to in Literature Essay, read. Avenir Next is another good option; it was released as a follow-up to A Case Against Animal Essay, Avenir to improve the font’s on-screen display capabilities. Dribbble/Mario Leo Fasolo. Surprised this one is on the list? There’s nothing wrong with the font in itself, it’s just that it has been (over)used and abused. Since everyone else is of the using it on their resumes, yours won’t stand out. Plus, Times New Roman is Against Animal hard to read at very small sizes and doesn’t display particularly well on screens.

Like Gill Sans on langston hughes our “Best” list, Futura was created in the 1920s. Except this sans-serif typeface was designed in A Case Essay, Germany and religion aztec, is more geometric in form. Although it’s a clean, attractive font, the overall appearance is somewhat stylized and atypical. A Case Against Testing? With quirks like unusually tall lowercase letters and 7, a jarring contrast between sharp and round letter shapes, Futura leans more toward decorative and interesting (a.k.a, a display font, meant to be used sparingly) than practical for text-heavy documents like resumes. In the overused category, Arial is Times New Roman’s sans-serif equivalent. Using a font that’s so common (and, some would say, boring) may be perceived as a lazy choice — not putting much thought or effort into your resume. Plus, Arial is basically an adaptation of A Case Against Testing, Helvetica that’s a little looser and more irregular in religion of the, its construction.

There’s nothing wrong with conventional fonts, but there are better sans-serif choices out there than Arial. Designed to replicate the look of a typewriter and later adapted for use on Animal actual electric typewriters, this font makes it look like — you guessed it — you typed your resume on a typewriter. Which you didn’t — unless you haven’t updated your resume in 30 some-odd years. Plus, because this is a monospaced typeface (every letter is spaced equally, as opposed to most other proportionally spaced fonts) it can look a little unnatural, particularly for whole pages of text. About The Bridge Of My Nose? Tempted to put your name at the top of A Case Animal, your resume in a script that looks like handwriting to give it a little personality? Don’t do it! And especially don’t use Brush Script, which has been so overused that it now looks cheap and dated rather than retro and nostalgic (it was designed in 1942). While certain creative industries will offer some leeway in playing with the appearance of langston life, your resume, when in A Case Against Essay, doubt, it’s always a safe bet to stick to conservative font choices (which means no scripts or other display fonts). Unless you’ve been living under a rock for the past several years, you’ll know that using Comic Sans is considered the Character's Blindness cardinal sin of Against Animal Testing Essay, font choices. It was created in 1994 to replicate the look of comic book speech bubbles, and Essay about, that’s about all it’s appropriate for.

The casual, almost childish look of the Against Essay font makes it distracting in any serious context. And in Essay, case you’re wondering why anyone would use Comic Sans on a resume, according to this manager, it does happen. Just remember: it’s a good rule of A Case Against Essay, thumb to hughes life, stay far away from any font that might possibly come across as fun, flowery, flashy, or funky. Century Gothic has a sleek, modern look, but it’s probably a little too irregular for resumes. Additionally, the Testing Essay thin letters of this font’s regular weight can be hard to read, particularly at small sizes.

There’s really no good reason anyone should want to use this on a resume, but people seem to like it. So if you’re tempted to Character's, give your resume an adventurous or exotic air with Papyrus, resist. This font is so cliche (probably second only to Comic Sans) that is has become something of Against Animal Testing, a joke — Fast Co. Design puts it this way: “as everyone who has written a school project over the last decade will tell you, Papyrus is the font you use to spell out the word #8220;Egypt.#8221; Want to make a bold, confident impression with your resume? You don’t need a bold, heavy font to do it. Impact is most likely intended for trump of the deal summary use in all caps for headlines, but because it includes lowercase letters, people are sure to use it for body copy, where it’s almost impossible to read. A Case Against Testing Essay? Yes, Trajan Pro has a dignified, important feel, but it would be more appropriate etched into stone than typed on your resume. That’s because the typeface was inspired by the letterforms carved into langston hughes, Trajan’s Column, a monument dedicated to the Roman emperor of the A Case Against Testing same name. The font only has capital letters and of the aztec, small caps (no lowercase option), which makes it unsuitable for A Case typing out readable sentences on your resume. So it’s probably a good idea to deal, leave Trajan to the movie posters (more than 400 of them), particularly those starring Russell Crowe.

For resumes, a font size of 10 to 12 pt. (depending on the particular font, but no smaller than that) is standard. A Case Animal Essay? Larger sizes are acceptable for headings or subheadings. Remember that everyone viewing your resume on a computer will have different fonts installed, and you don’t want your carefully chosen typeface automatically replaced with a substitute that messes up the document’s appearance and formatting. That’s why it’s a good idea to always save and send your resume as a PDF, which preserves the original appearance (unlike a MS Word document). Do you have a favorite (or least favorite) font for system resumes? Share in the comments below. Bring great design to your entire workplace. Testing Essay? Janie is a freelance writer and graphic designer and the owner of Design Artistree Creative Studio. After college, she built on her background in macbeth atto 1 scena 7, art to explore design. and loved it. Now, she enjoys finding ways to combine the Testing craftsmanship of traditional fine arts with the trump digital possibilities of graphic design.

Build Your Brand: How to Choose The Right Fonts. A Case Animal? 60 Free Sans Serif Fonts to Give Your Designs a Modern . Summary? 60 Free Serif Fonts to Give Your Designs a Traditional . 60 Free Calligraphy Fonts to Bring Charm to Your Design. 60 Free Outline Icon Sets Perfect for Contemporary Desi. 60 Free Fonts for Minimalist Designs. 50 Free Headline Fonts Built For Impact And Audience En. 50 Beautiful Free Wallpapers For Creatives [2015 Editio. A Case Against Animal Essay? 50 Design Terms Explained Simply For Non-Designers. The 30 Best Free Social Media Icon Sets of 2015. 100 Brilliant Color Combinations and How to Apply Them . Free Icons: 49 Best Sites To Find Beautiful And Useful . Hughes Life? 60 Awesome Free Tools To Create A Visual Marketing Camp.

Free Stock Photos: 73 Best Sites To Find Awesome Free I. You're almost there! You’ll receive an Against Animal Essay email soon to confirm your subscription.

Write My Paper - Against Animal Testing - Essay - 1399 Words | Bartleby

Nov 17, 2017 A Case Against Animal Testing Essay,

Essay Writing Service - Writing An Against Animal Testing Essay In A Matter Of Hours

essays good Read the topic and sample essay, then study the comments. Click on the highlighted text for Animal Testing comments about academic writing conventions; click on the notes in the margin for commentary on of the deal summary the essay. Birth rates are falling in developed countries. A Case Animal Testing! There is one simple reason for this - young people nowadays are just too selfish and too self-centred to have children. And this is particularly true of women.

To what extent do you agree with this view? Support your argument with relevant readings and evidence. Countries in the developed world have seen a big shift in attitudes to population growth. Several generations ago, it was generally believed that too many babies were being born, and religion aztec, that societies should try to reduce their populations. Nowadays, however, the concern is the reverse - that birthrates are falling too low and that urgent action is needed to encourage people to have more children. But what are the causes of A Case Animal Testing Essay this trend? And how much are the attitudes and of the, lifestyles of young people to blame? This essay will consider a number of explanations for the so-called baby crash. My argument will be that to hold young people responsible is neither valid nor helpful.

The best explanation, I believe , is to Animal, be found in the condition of increased economic insecurity faced by the young. The birth rate has fallen dramatically in many parts of the world. Langston! To take several examples, in Europe in 1960, the total fertility rate (TFR) was about 2.6 births per female, but in 1996 it had fallen to 1.4 (Chesnais, 1998) . In many Asian countries, similar declines have been experienced. Japan now has a birthrate of only about 1.3, and Hong Kong#039;s has fallen to below 1.0 (Ichimura and Animal Essay, Ogawa, 2000) . A TFR of below 2.0 means that a country#039;s population is not replaced, and thus there is a net population decline. This ageing of the population has the potential to Character's, create serious problems. Animal! Fewer children being born means that in the long term, a smaller proportion of the populace will be economically productive, whilst a larger proportion will be old and economically dependent - in the form of pension, health care and macbeth 7, other social services. Most experts agree that these greying societies will not be able escape serious social and A Case Against Testing, economic decline in the future (Chesnais, 1998). So what are the causes of this trend and what can be done to stop it? One common approach has been to lay the blame on young people and their supposedly self-centred values. It is argued that in developed societies, we now live in a post-materialist age, where individuals do not have to be so concerned about basic material conditions to survive (McDonald, 2000a). Thus people, especially the young, have become more focussed on the values of self-realisation and the satisfaction of Blindness in Literature personal preferences, at the expense of traditional values like raising a family.

A strong version of this view is put forward by Japanese sociologist, Masahiro Yamada (cited in Ashby, 2000) . He uses the term parasite singles to refer to A Case Against Animal Testing, grown children in religion aztec their 20s and 30s who have left school and are employed, but remain unmarried and continue live at home with their parents. These young people are spoilt, he says, and interested only in their own pleasure - mainly in the form of shopping. A Case Animal Essay! According to Yamada , it is langston life, this focus on self, more than any other factor, that is responsible for Japan#039;s languishing birth rate (Ashby, 2000). In other developed countries, there is a similar tendency for the young to remain at home enjoying a single lifestyle - and a similar tendency for older people to interpret this as selfishness (McDonald, 2000a). But is it reasonable to attribute the Against Testing baby crash to the pleasure-seeking values of the young? The problem with this view is that whenever young people are surveyed about their attitudes to family, not only do they say they want to have children, they also express preferences for family sizes that are, on average, above the replacement level (McDonald, 2000a). As an example, McDonald quotes an Australian study that found that women aged 20-24 expected to have an average of 2.33 children in their lifetime.

Findings like this suggest that the values of the young are not at all incompatible with the idea of having a family. It seems then that, as young people progress through their twenties and thirties, they encounter obstacles along the way that prevent them from fulfilling their plans to be parents. Some conservative thinkers believe the main obstacle is the changed role and status of women (eg. Norton, 2003). According to this view, because young women now have greater educational and career opportunities than in previous generations, they are finding the use case diagram for railway reservation idea of family and motherhood less attractive. Thus, educated middle class women are delaying marriage and childbirth or even rejecting motherhood altogether.

It is claimed that women#039;s improved status - which may be a good thing in itself - has had the unfortunate consequence of threatening population stability. But there are several problems with this argument. For one, the Animal Essay lowest TFRs in Europe are found in aztec Spain and Italy (around 1.2), both more traditional, male-oriented societies, which offer fewer opportunities to women. In comparison, Sweden which has been a leading country in advancing the rights of women enjoys a higher TFR (1.6 in 1996) - even though it is still below replacement. Chesnais (1998: p. Against! 99) refers to this contrast as the feminist paradox and concludes that empowerment of women [actually] ensures against a very low birth rate (my emphasis) . Another problem with trying to link improved education levels for women to low birth rates is that fertility in in Literature developed countries seems to be declining across all education and class levels. Against Testing! In a recent survey of Australian census data, Birrell (2003) found that, whereas the non-tertiary-educated group was once very fertile, its rate of partnering is now converging towards that of tertiary educated women. We can summarise the discussion to about Massaging the Bridge of My Nose, this point as follows: Young people today, in spite of what#039;s said about their values, still express a desire to have children.

However, few end up having as many as they say they would like. The improved education and career opportunities for women does not seem to A Case Against, be the decisive factor in reducing the number of trump the art of the deal summary children that a woman has. These conclusions suggest that there must be something else involved. Many writers are now pointing to Against Testing Essay, a different factor - the economic condition of young people and Character's Blindness, their growing sense of Essay insecurity. Peter McDonald (2000a) in his article #039;Low fertility in Australia: Evidence, causes and policy responses#039; discusses some of the things that a couple will consider when they are thinking of having a child. One type of about thinking is what McDonald calls Rational Choice Theory, whereby a couple make an assessment of the Testing Essay relative costs and benefits associated with becoming a parent. In traditional societies, there has usually been an economic benefit in having children because they can be a source of labour to help the family. In developed societies, however, children now constitute an of the aztec, economic cost, and so, it is argued, the benefits are more of A Case Against Testing a psychological kind - for example, enjoying the status of macbeth atto 1 scena 7 being a parent, having baby who will be fun and will grow up to love you, having offspring who will carry on the family name etc.

The problem, McDonald suggests, is that for many couples nowadays the economic cost can easily outweigh any perceived psychological benefits. McDonald (2000b) discusses another type of decision-making - Risk Aversion Theory - which he says is also unfavourable to the birth rate. A Case Against Testing Essay! According to this theory, when we make important decisions in our lives life, if we perceive uncertainty in our environment, we usually err on the side of safety in order to avert risk. McDonald points to a rise in economic uncertainty which he thinks has steered a lot of young people away from life-changing decisions like marriage and parenthood: Jobs are no longer lifetime jobs. There is a strong economic cycle of booms and busts.

Geographic mobility may be required for system employment purposes (McDonald, 2000: p.15). Birrell (2003) focuses on increased economic uncertainty for men. Referring to the situation in Australia, he discusses men#039;s reluctance to form families in terms of perceived costs and risks: Many men are poor - in 2001, 42 per cent of men aged 25-44 earnt less than $32,000 a year. Only two-thirds of men in this age group were in full-time work. Young men considering marriage could hardly be unaware of the Against Testing Essay risks of marital breakdown or the long-term costs, especially when children are involved (Birrell, 2003: p.12). And Yuji Genda (2000) in Japan, responding to Yamada#039;s analysis of parasite singles, argues that the failure of for railway reservation young Japanese to leave home and start families is not due to self-indulgence, but is an understandable response to increasingly difficult economic circumstances. Genda (2000) notes that it is the young who have had to bear the brunt of the decade long restructuring of the Japanese economy, with youth unemployment hovering around 10% and a marked reduction in secure full-time jobs for A Case Animal Testing the young. Young people around the world seem to Character's Essay, have an increasing perception of economic uncertainty and A Case Against, contemplate something their parents would have found impossible - a decline in living standards over their lifetime.

According to a 1990 American survey, two thirds of respondents in the 18-29 age group thought it would be more difficult for their generation to live as comfortably as previous generations (cited in Newman, 2000: p.505). Furthermore, around 70% believed they would have difficulty purchasing a house, and around 50% were worried about their future. Findings like these suggest that the younger generation may be reluctant to have children, not because they have more exciting things to Essay the Bridge of My Nose, do, but because they have doubts about their capacity to provide as parents. If we accept that economics has played a significant role in young people choosing to A Case Animal Testing Essay, have fewer babies, then the key to langston life, reversing this trend is for governments to A Case Against Animal Testing Essay, take action to remove this sense of insecurity. A number of atto 1 scena policy approaches have been suggested. Some writers have focussed on the need for better welfare provisions for families - like paid parental leave, family allowances, access to child care, etc (Chesnais, 1998). Others have called for A Case Animal more radical economic reforms that would increase job security and raise the living standards of the young (McDonald, 2000b). It is hard to religion of the aztec, know what remedies are needed. What seems clear, however, is that young people are most unlikely to reproduce simply because their elders have told them that it is Against Essay, selfish to do otherwise.

Castigating the young will not have the effect of making them willing parents; instead it is likely to just make them increasingly resentful children. Ashby, J. (2000). Life! Parasite singles: Problem or victims? The Japan Times. 7/04/02.

Birrell, B. (2003). Fertility crisis: why you can#039;t blame the blokes. Testing! The Age 17/01/03 p. 14. Chesnais, J-C. (1998). Below-replacement fertility in in Literature the European Union: Facts and Policies, 1960-1997. Review of Population and Social Policy, No 7, pp. Against Animal Testing Essay! 83-101. Genda, Y. (2000). A debate on Japan#039;s Dependent Singles, Japan Echo, June, 2000, pp. 47-56. Ichimura, S. and N. Ogawa (2000).

Policies to meet the challenge of an aging society with declining fertility: Japan and other East Asian countries. Paper presented at the 2000 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, USA. McDonald, P. (2000a). Low fertility in Australia: Evidence, causes and use case diagram reservation system, policy responses. People and Place, No 8:2. A Case Animal Essay! pp 6-21. McDonald, P. (2000b).

The toolbox of public policies to impact on use case reservation system fertility - a global view. Paper prepared for the Annual Seminar 2000 of the European Observatory on Family Matters, Low Fertility, families and Against Essay, Public Policies, Sevilla (Spain), 15-16 September 2000. Norton, A. (2003). Student debt: A HECS on fertility? Issue Analysis No 3. Melbourne: Centre for Independent Studies. Newman, D. Langston Hughes Life! (2000). Sociology: Exploring the architecture of everyday life. California: Pine Forge. Notice what the question is asking students to do - in this case saying how much they agree with the #039;view#039; in the topic. Against Testing Essay! What do you think? Is this a reasonable explanation for Essay the declining birthrate?

Hint: always spend some time looking over and thinking about an Against Animal Testing, essay topic before you start your planning and reading for it. As part of this thinking, you should give some thought to what your position (argument) could be. Notice how in the introduction, this student writer: introduces the topic area in a general way (ie. declining birthrates) introduces the main issue to be covered in the essay (ie. why this is happening). Hint: there are many different ways you can begin an essay - if you are stuck, try beginning with i) and about, ii). In the Against Animal Essay last part of the introduction, the student introduces his argument. Notice how he disagrees with the explanation in the topic, and then offers an alternative explanation.

Hint: in the introduction it is always a good idea to hughes, state what you intend to argue. In this paragraph, the A Case Animal Essay student considers the first part of the topic - that birth rates have fallen. This is presented as background information. Notice how the student begins the paragraph with a claim (that the birth rate has fallen dramatically in many parts of the world) and macbeth atto, then supports this with relevant evidence (statistics from Europe and Asia). Hint: in Against Animal Testing your writing be aware when you are making claims - be aware also of the need to support them with some evidence. After giving some background in langston hughes paragraph 2, the student reminds the reader what the main issue is Against Animal Testing, - why birthrates have declined? Notice also that the student has seen the reservation issue as a #039;problem#039; - and asks What can be done about it? Hint: always be aware what the Testing Essay main issue is atto 7, you are addressing in your work.

This paragraph mainly summarises the ideas of those who think young people are to blame for A Case declining birthrates. Of The! Notice how in the first part of the paragraph, these ideas are discussed in a general way. In the second part, the A Case Against Testing student focuses on the ideas of a single writer (Yamada) as a specific example of Character's Blindness in Literature this view. Hint: always try to find opportunities in your work to engage with the ideas of individual writers. The previous paragraph was concerned with summarising some ideas. Notice how in this new paragraph, the student provides a critique of these ideas. (Recall the student#039;s argument in the introduction: . to Animal Testing, hold young people responsible is neither valid nor helpful). Notice too that the student provides some supporting evidence for Essay Massaging of My Nose this critique - mainly from the work of McDonald. Hint: it is Against Testing Essay, quite OK to criticise the ideas of other writers - in Character's in Literature fact many essay topics will specifically ask you to do this. Against Animal Testing Essay! But if you are going to be critical, you need to provide good reasons for your critique. Recall that the topic suggested that young people were to blame for declining birthrates - and macbeth atto 1 scena 7, then went on to single out women.

In this paragraph, the student takes up this gender issue. Hint: aim to Testing, structure your essays so that all issues in the topic are covered - and in some logical sequence. In this paragraph the student seeks to dismiss the view that young women are to Character's Blindness Essay, blame. (There are several problems with this argument).Notice that the student then goes on to explain these problems (For one. ; Another problem is that . ). Hint: the providing of a well-organised critique is something your lecturers will value highly in your work. Recall the Against Essay second part of the student#039;s argument stated in the introduction: The best explanation is to be found in the condition of increased economic insecurity faced by the young. The student now elaborates on this part of the use case diagram reservation argument. Hint: remember that the argument is the key to Against Animal Essay, any essay you write. In the body of Essay about Massaging Nose your essay, you need to be sure that your argument comes through clearly.

Providing evidence for the argument. The student is arguing that economic insecurity experienced by young people is the main reason why the birthrate is in decline. Notice how in Animal Essay the rest of the hughes essay, he seeks to support this argument with various forms of Testing Essay evidence. The student presents a range of evidence: several theories discussed by Character's Essay McDonald some research by Birrell comments by Genda results of a US survey. Hint: it is important to have an argument in your essay. But it is Testing, equally important to provide support for reservation system what you are arguing. Your essays will be judged mainly on your ability to A Case Against Animal Essay, do these two things. There are a number of things happening in the conclusion. In the first sentence, the student restates his argument - if we accept that. . He then goes on to discuss what could be done to deal with the problem.

In broad terms this is summary, a discussion of the Animal implications of the students#039; argument. Notice also how the student mentions the langston life negative implications of the blaming approach. Hint: a conclusion that only restates the A Case argument can be a bit uninteresting. You might also like to consider the implications of your argument - but you should do this briefly. Think: I have argued for this position - so what might follow on from this. You may have noticed that this essay is quite tightly structured.

Its paragraph structure can be set out religion of the, thus: Introduction Background to issue Explanation point 1 - summary student#039;s critique Explanation point 2 - summary student#039;s critique Student#039;s alternative explanation - Evidence 1 - Evidence 2 - Evidence 3 Conclusion. Hint: always try to map out a structure for your essay. Do this before you do too much writing. You may have noticed that the essay is free of spelling, typographical and grammatical errors. Hint: always read your work very carefully before you submit it. Avoid doing your editing on the screen. Against Essay! Always print out and edit from a hard copy. Note in the references section, you need to list all the texts you have referred to (cited) in the essay - not all the texts you have read, as some students mistakenly believe. Notice that the langston hughes life sample essay refers to A Case Testing Essay, a total of nine texts.

This is a good number, and indicates that the student has done a fair amount of reading. Hint: try to of the, include a reference to most of the texts that you read for an essay - so that you can build up a reasonable list of references. Of course, all references have to be relevant to Against Essay, your argument. Notice how the student uses I in his essay: The best explanation, I believe, is. Life! And in the previous sentence, another first person pronoun is Animal Testing Essay, used: My argument is that . Some students have the impression that they are not allowed to use these words in Character's Blindness in Literature their written work. But in fact they can often be found in academic writing. In general, the best place to use them is in the introduction - when you are presenting your argument. But if you are concerned that it is not OK to use I, you can use other expressions - which avoid self-reference, but which mean much the same thing, e.g. This essay will argue that . Remember though, that the really important issue is not the words you use to present your argument - but that your essay actually has a clear argument.

Try to keep your paragraphs a reasonable length. (Most paragraphs in this essay are around 7-8 sentences long.) Citations are used to indicate the source of the ideas you have used in Against Animal Testing your essay. Note that there are two main citation systems: the author-date system (also known as Harvard); the footnote system (also known as Oxford). In this essay, the author-date system has been used. (Always check which system is required in each of your subjects.) Citation 2 (Ichimura and trump of the, Ogawa, 2000) Citations can be set out in a number of ways. One method is to A Case Against Testing, present some information and then provide the citation immediately after it to indicate the source.

These are known as #039;information-prominent#039; citations eg: Japan now has a birthrate of only about 1.3, and Hong Kong#039;s has fallen to below 1.0 (Ichimura and Essay about Massaging of My Nose, Ogawa, 2000). Other formats are considered further on. Citation 3 Masahiro Yamada (cited in A Case Animal Testing Essay Ashby, 2000) This citation means that the student is dealing with the ideas of Yamada, but actually read about Essay about Massaging of My Nose them in Ashby#039;s text. Whilst you should make an effort to Animal Testing Essay, read ideas in their original form, this is not always possible. In such cases, use the #039;cited in#039; format. When you are summarising the ideas of langston hughes a writer, you need to use reporting expressions like the A Case Against Animal ones used here: He [Yamada] uses the term . According to Yamada.

You use these to distance yourself from certain language. About! eg. when you are using an informal expression, or a term used by others that you don#039;t necessarily agree with. In this paragraph, the student wants to reject the view in the topic - that young people#039;s selfishness is to blame for the declining birthrate. Notice how he does this in a careful way, by using expressions like: Findings like this suggest that . It seems then that . Being careful about the way you express your claims is a distinctive feature of academic style. When you quote an author (like Chesnais here) you need to use quotation marks, and indicate the exact page number in Against Animal the citation.

Sometimes you may need to change the langston life wording of the quote slightly so that it fits into your sentence. If you need to add/change any words, use [ ]; if you need to delete words, use . (Whilst it is OK to change the wording of a quote, you must never change its sense.) Use italics when you want to emphasise a word. (When you do this in a quote, you need to indicate that it is Testing, your emphasis.) It#039;s OK to use dot points in an essay (or numbered points here), but use them very sparingly. Citation 4 Peter McDonald (2000a) . Essay Massaging The Bridge Of My Nose! discusses. Notice how in some citations the author can be part of the A Case Against sentence: Peter McDonald (2000a) . discusses some of the trump deal summary things etc.

This is known as an #039;author-prominent#039; citation and A Case, is very common in academic writing. Notice the use of Blindness reporting verbs in this citation type (discusses). Use #039;inverted commas#039; for the title of an article. Use italics for the title of a book. Notice some of the other reporting expressions used in the student#039;s summary of Peter McDonald#039;s ideas: . what McDonald calls. . McDonald points to . . which he thinks. It#039;s very important to make it clear to your reader when one paragraph ends and A Case Animal, a new one begins. In this paragraph (#9), there is some potential for confusion. Notice how the Essay about Massaging of My Nose student has used indenting to make this clear. Quotes of more than one sentence in A Case Against Animal Testing Essay length should be separated from the main text. Notice how these are indented and are in a slightly smaller font.

Again you should indicate the page number. You only of My Nose, have to provide a separate list of references when you use the Testing author-date system. Entries should be set out in trump the art of the alphabetical order. Each entry should generally be set out in the following order and format: Author family name, Initial. (date). Title. Place: Publisher. It is becoming increasingly common for students to A Case Animal Essay, refer to sources from the world wide web in their essays. In addition to providing author and title of site, you need to include: the URL for atto 7 the site when you accessed the Against Animal Essay site.

Although web references can be very useful, you obviously need to exercise some caution - there is a lot of junk around. Check all sites carefully to be sure the macbeth information provided has credibility (.edu and .org sites are generally the more reliable). Problems? Questions? Comments?

Please provide us feedback.

You Can Now Order Essay Assistance From Real Academics - Against animal testing essay

Nov 17, 2017 A Case Against Animal Testing Essay,

Online Essay Writing Service - Against Animal Testing - Essay - 1399 Words | Bartleby

Essay on the Lokpal | Public Administration. Here is an essay on the ‘Lokpal’ for class 9, 10, 11 and 12. Find paragraphs, long and A Case Animal Testing short essays on the ‘Lokpal’ especially written for for railway reservation system school and college students. Essay on the Machinery for Redress of Public Grievances Essay on the Salient Features of Lok Pal Bill, 2001 Essay on the Jurisdiction of Lokpal Bill Essay on How a Complaint will be Lodged ? Essay on the Functions of Lokpal. Essay # 1. Machinery for Redress of Public Grievances: The Administrative Reforms Commission recommended in 1966 the adoption of the Animal Testing Essay Om­budsman type of Institution in religion aztec, India.

This was on Animal Testing the pattern of Commissioners in New Zealand and England. In 1969 and 1971 the Government vacillatingly introduced Lokpal Bills in Lok Sabha. The legislation lapsed with the dissolution of the fourth and the fifth Lok Sabha. How­ever, the langston hughes life Bill had excluded Prime Minister from purview of Lokpal. The Congress Government under Mrs. Indira Gandhi proposed to set up the institution of A Case Against Animal Testing Essay, Lokpal at the Central level but the the art of the Bill lapsed.

With the inception of Janta Government in 1977, the proposal was revived in order to end corruption in public life of the country again, on July 28, 1977 by the Janata Party. This bill brought Prime Minister also within the purview of Lokpal. Secondly, the Lokpal was allowed to have his own administrative machinery to carry out investigations. He had not to depend upon A Case Against Animal, governmental machinery to carry out his task. The Bill, however, could not be enacted. The Rajiv Gandhi Government was also enthu­siastic enough to take up the about matter. A Case Testing. Hence, it introduced the Lokpal Bill in the Parliament in 1985. The Lokpal Bill was referred for the consideration of a Joint Select Committee. Till the dissolu­tion of Lok Sabha in 1989, the langston hughes life Bill could not be passed. Hence it was again set at naught.

On December 29, 1989 Janata Dal Law Minister introduced the Lokpal Bill. Against Essay. The Bill sought to Essay, establish Lokpal with a Chairman and 2 members—serving or retired Judges of Supreme Court. However, the Bill could not be enacted, the Rao Government also failed to introduce the Bill afresh. It was again introduced by Prime Minister A.B. Vajpayee on August 3, 1998—the sev­enth time. After the resignation of the then Vajpayee Govt., in A Case Against Testing, May 1999 and the dissolution of Lok Sabha, the Lokpal Bill ran into rough weather. The Lokpal Bill was again introduced on August 19, 2001 which also failed to be enacted and the Vajpayee Government resigned. Several states have passed Lokayukta Acts and have actually appointed Lokayuktas to keep a vigilant eye on the public officials. The Institution could exercise wholesome influence on public administration.

Essay # 2. The Salient Features of Lok Pal Bill, 2001: Lokpal is to of the, be appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister who is to consult Chief Justice of India and the leader of the Opposition. If there is A Case, no such leader, the Prime Minister is required to consult a person elected by the members of the Character's Blindness Opposition in A Case Testing Essay, the Lok Sabha in such a manner as the Speaker may direct. The Lokpal is to command the same status as that of the hughes life Chief Justice of India and the other members to have status of either serving or retired judges of the Supreme Court. Their tenure is five years though they are re-eligible for another five years. They will not be removable from office except in the manner prescribed in the Constitution for the removal from office of a judge of the Supreme Court. On appointment as Lokpal, they will cease to be members of any legislature if they will be one before the appointment. Likewise, they will no longer hold an office of profit on this assignment.

They will cease to be a member of any political party and sever his business connections if any. After retirement, they will not be eligible for any appointment under the Government or in A Case Against, a Govern­ment undertaking. They will be free to choose their own staff, though their conditions of service will be subject to the control of the Parliament. All this has been done to enable the Lokpal to about Massaging of My, perform his functions with objectivity and ensure their independence. Besides, their salaries will be those of A Case Against Animal Testing Essay, Chief Justice in case of Chairman and judges of Supreme Court in case of members. Macbeth Atto 1 Scena. Adequate salary helps in ensuring independence and objectivity. Essay # 3. Animal Testing. Jurisdiction of Lokpal Bill: The Lokpal is a standing machinery to investigate cases of misconduct against public men.

He is not a functionary to deal with redress of religion aztec, citizens grievances in respect of injustice or undue hardship on account of maladministration. His is an A Case Against Testing institution to probe into cases of corruption in public life. The Bill brought within the purview of Lokpal the Prime Minister as well. It was not to have any jurisdiction to conduct enquiry into the allegations against the President, Vice Presi­dent, the Speaker of Lok Sabha, the Chief Justice or any judge of the Supreme Court, the Comptroller and atto Auditor General, the Chief Election Commissioner or Election Commission, the Chairman or any member of the UPSC. The Lokpal was not to have jurisdiction to enquire into any matter concerning any person if any of its members has any bias in respect to person or matter concerned. The Lokpal was also not to enquire into any matter referred to enquiry under Commission of Enquiry Act or into any complaint made five years after the date of offence mentioned in Against Animal Testing, the complaint.

However, the Character's Blindness in Literature Bill could not be enacted as parliament was dissolved. A Case Animal. The Narasimha Rao government failed to introduce the Bill afresh during its five years rule obviously for political reasons. Same happened in previous government led by Vajpayee. Towards the fag end of their tenure, the Character's NDA government thought of introducing Lok Pal Bill. Against Animal Testing. The critics called it election-oriented step only on ‘Hawala gate scandal’ had tarnished the image of the ruling majority party. Hughes. However, the Bill could not see the light of the day as an act. The UPA Government also has been debating the issue since its holding the A Case Animal Essay reins of langston hughes, government. Eventually, it thought of introduc­ing the Lok Pal Bill again at the far end of its tenure. However, these attempts to have a Lok Pal reflects that our political executive is fully conscious of the necessity of A Case Against Testing, having such an institution to rope in corrupt politicians who are always out to make hay while the sun shines brightly for them. In the words of Dr.

S.R. Maheshwari “one must however want that the langston hughes life insti­tution of Lokpal has a fruitful role to A Case Against Animal Essay, play in a system of government which habitually .operates at a reasonably high level of integrity, efficiency and devotion. The smaller the zone of admin­istrative wrong the greater is the utility of Lok Pal…” In fact, in a country like India, Lokpal or Lokayuklta are hardly panaceas of all our ills. These institutions are expedient to function as Sword of Damocles on the head of political executives. Administrative reforms are the crying need of the hour. If the administration is to be rewamped. Besides Lokpal it is essential to have another Institution to redress the grievances of the people who are victim of high-handedness of corrupt officials. Essay # 4. How a Complaint will be Lodged ? A complaint involving a grievance will be made by the aggrieved person. However, in case, the aggrieved person is dead or incapacitated, then complaint will be lodged by a person who legally represents the estate of the aggrieved person or any other person authorized by the former. A complaint involving an allegation can be lodged by any person other than a public servant.

Moreover, every complaint has to be made in such a form and is to be accompanied by such affidavits as prescribed from time to time. Letters addressed to langston, Lokpal by A Case Testing Essay persons in Essay about Massaging the Bridge of My Nose, police custody or in jail or in any asylum for insane persons will be forwarded unopened and without delay by the concerned authorities to Lokpal who may treat such letters as bona fide complaints. Essay # 5. Functions of Lokpal: He will be able to initiate investigation on receipt of a complaint properly filed before him. However before starting any investigation he has been required to forward a copy of the complaint or a statement laying down the grounds for investigation to the concerned and to A Case Against Essay, the competent authority and afford the concerned an opportunity to make comments. Investigation is to be carried on secretly.

The identity of the complainant and the con­cerned is macbeth atto 1 scena, not to be disclosed to the public or the press, before, during or after the Animal Testing Essay investigation. He may conduct public investigation in case involving public interest if he deems fit to do so. He has, in fact, the discretionary powers to investigate the cases and to determine whether there are enough grounds for investigation. Blindness In Literature. If he decides not to entertain a complaint or discontinue investigation after starting it, he is expected to convey the Against Animal Essay reasons for the same to the complain­ant and also the concerned official. In the course of Essay the Bridge of My Nose, investigation, he can ask any public servant or any other person to Against Animal Essay, pro­duce documents or furnish any information. He constitutes in himself a sort of about Massaging the Bridge of My Nose, civil court to: (a) Summon and enforce attendance of any person and to examine him on oath; (b) Require discov­ery and production of any document;

(c) Receive evidence on affidavits; (d) Requisition any public record from A Case Against Essay, any court or office; (e) Issue instructions for examination of witness/docu­ments. However, no information need be furnished to Lokpal if such information: (a) Prejudices the security or defence or international relations of the country; (b) Is concerned with investiga­tion or detection of a crime; (c) Involves disclosure of proceedings of life, Union Cabinet or Cabinet of any Union Territory or the Executive Council of Delhi Administration or any committee of A Case Against Testing, such Cabinet or Executive Council. No person can be forced by Lokpal to give any evidence or produce any document which he could not be compelled to give or produce before a court. Of My Nose. Further, he can requisition the services of any officer or investigation agency of Central Government with the A Case Essay concurrence of the latter or of any other person or agency.

After conducting investigation, he is to send a report of his findings and recommendations to the competent authority of the public servant concerned. The Prime Minister is such a competent authority who can initiate within three months of the receipt of recommendations the action taken or proposed to be taken against the concerned, if all or any of the allegations have been substantiated against the minister. However in case of the Prime Min­ister, it is left to the Lok Sabha to macbeth atto, take action as ultimately that political functionary is respon­sible to the people through their representatives. Where the allegations in the complaint have not been wholly or partially substantiated, the Lokpal will close the case. Besides the special report, the Lokpal is required to submit a consolidated an­nual report on his performance to the President who is to A Case Against Animal, place the copy of the religion report before each House with explanatory memorandum. No proceedings of Lokpal can be challenged in any court of Against Animal Testing Essay, law except on ground of jurisdiction. No legal proceedings can lie against Lokpal for anything done under the Act in trump deal summary, good faith. The President of India is empowered to appoint one or more than one Lokayukta in consultation with Lokpal. Lokayukta is A Case Against Animal, under the administrative control of Lokpal who can issue directions regarding convenient disposal of investigation. However, Lokpal is not authorized to question any finding, conclusion or recommendation of Lokayukta.

Though institution of Character's in Literature Essay, Lok Pal has not yet been established at the central level yet many states have owned this concept. Hence in Orissa, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Bihar and UP were the pioneer in setting up Lokayukta. Presently four­teen states have opted for this institution. Lokayukta is supposed to have jurisdiction over actions of Against Animal Testing, public servants other than within the purview of Lokpal. The competent authority for the purposes of recommendations in the case of Lokayukta, will be such as may be notified from in Literature Essay, time to time. The conditions of appointment, tenure of office, removal, scope of functions, manner of making complaint, manner of functioning recommendation, reports, secrecy of information, contempt and protection in respect of Lokayukta are analogous to those in respect of Lokpal. In a significant move, the Orissa Government repealed the Orissa Lokpal and Lokayukta Act under which a Lokpal functioned in Animal, the state to probe into charges of macbeth 1 scena 7, criminal misconduct, corruption among others against state ministers including the Testing Essay chief minister and legislators.

This was done by an ordinance issued by Governor. This was not a welcome development. On December 10, 1996 an ordinance was issued in Punjab for implementing Punjab Lokpal Act. To deter the non-serious the government raised the fee for filling complaints with the Lokpal from Rs. 1000 to Rs. 5000. Though the number of complaints to the Lokpal is getting piled in the states, yet bulk of people are still not acquainted with the Institution.

In some states, its jurisdiction remains limited. Many administrations are kept outside his purview. For instance Chief Ministers and ministers in almost all states are kept outside the jurisdiction of Lokayukta. In some states they have been deprived of investigating agencies. This has enhanced their dependence on Government agencies. In-fact, involvement of officials in this indirect manner is neither desirable nor cherishable by the Lokayuktas. It will not be out of place to point out that in almost all states the institution has been shown cold shoulders by the respective governments.

CM Bihar Abdul Gafar while presenting first Annual Report on the Institution in the Assembly remarked “…I feel that the sovereign House has parted with its sovereignty by Character's Blindness in Literature Essay creating the institution of lokayukta and arming it with powers to enquire into the conduct of the members including Minister.” The Lokayupta institution, as has existed in several states mostly remains a toothless tiger. A Case Animal. A report well summed up. “The Institution of Lokpal is trump, a still born while that of Lokayukta in Against, states are ineffective. But the strengthening of the institution there is the sure-way of develop­ment of langston, democracy with integrity.” Upload Your Knowledge on Political science:

© 2017 PoliticalScienceNotes - All rights reserved.